Skip to main content
Contact our administrator Back to Homepage
ReGROUP - Thank you!

The ReGROUP study started in January 2016 and finished in September 2017.

Thank you to all of our participants and research staff.

ReGROUP

ReGROUP

The changing general practitioner workforce: the development of policies and strategies aimed at retaining experienced GPs and those taking a career break in direct patient care is a project funded by NIHR’s Health Services & Delivery Research programme which aims to inform and support the NHS in addressing current GP workforce issues in the UK.

About ReGROUP

The study is multi-centre in collaboration with the University of Bristol and we are also working with partners within the University of Exeter Business School and the Centre for Workforce Intelligence.

There are around 1.3 million consultations with GPs in the UK every working day. However, unless urgent action is taken, the UK will face with a serious shortage of GPs within the next few years.

As it takes at least 10 years to train a GP, recruiting more GPs is not an immediate solution, and understanding how we can retain the existing workforce is essential. This research aims to gain insight into the problems of GPs quitting direct patient care through retirement or taking a career break, and will help provide strategies and policies for the NHS in seeking to maintain the GP workforce.

Read on for more information about the project's 6 work streams.

There are several reasons for the shortage of GPs.

  • Fewer medical students are opting for a career in general practice.
  • In addition, the GP workforce is ageing, especially in inner city areas where it is much harder to recruit and retain doctors.
  • In addition, increasing numbers of experienced doctors over the age of 50 are considering retiring, or quitting patient care within the next five years.
  • There are also now more women than men opting to train as GPs. A high proportion of these doctors will take a career break, with a significant proportion not returning to the workforce or returning part time. A recent NHS report has recognised this imminent crisis and recommended urgent action to understand the reasons for the loss of both experienced GPs and those taking a career break.
  • In addition, the general population is ageing with increasingly complex health needs placing additional demands on GP time. Shortage of GPs will thus put patients at risk and exacerbate inequalities in care.

As it takes at least 10 years to train a GP, recruiting more GPs is not an immediate solution, and understanding how we can retain the existing workforce is essential. This research aims to gain insight into the problems of GPs quitting direct patient care through retirement or taking a career break, and will help provide strategies and policies for the NHS in seeking to maintain the GP workforce.


This research consists of six projects.

  1. First, we will conduct a systematic review of existing literature to find out what evidence already exists about GPs decisions to quit direct patient care.
  2. Second, we will conduct a survey of GPs in South West England to identify those considering early retirement or taking a career break and to help identify GPs for our qualitative research.
  3. Third, we will carry out interviews with experienced GPs aged 50-60 years old who are intending to, or who have already quit direct patient care, and with GPs who have taken, or who are thinking about taking, a career break. These will allow us to develop our understanding about why GPs decide to leave face to face patient care. The results from the literature review and interviews will allow us to develop some policies and strategies that might be expected to encourage GPs to stay in direct patient care.
  4. Fourth, once we have identified these policies and strategies, we will ask a panel of experts, including commissioners, GPs, practice managers, and PPI representatives to review, and prioritise the policies.
  5. Fifth, alongside this research programme we will develop computer models that will help us identify which general practices may be “at risk” in terms of maintaining their GP workforce over the next five years. Thus, the policies and strategies we have developed through our research could potentially be targeted at the practices most likely to benefit from them.
  6. Finally, we will consult with key stakeholders responsible for planning the GP workforce to find out whether they think the policies and strategies are acceptable to practices and healthcare planners, and to comment on whether they would be taken up within a short enough time to be helpful. PPI representatives will play a critical role in reflecting on whether patients are likely to find the policies and strategies acceptable.

ReGROUP is a comprehensive mixed-method programme of work involving six major workstreams.

Workstream 1: Systematic Review

A systematic review of empirical research conducted in the UK describing factors influencing GPs decisions to quit patient care will be led by Associate Professor Rob Anderson within the Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement (ESMI) group.

Workstream 2: Census Survey

A census survey of all GPs in South West England will be undertaken to describe the current and projected GP capacity within the next five years in the region and to also provide an opportunity to invite GPs to take part in qualitative interviews within workstream 3. The survey will be led by Professor John Campbell and Emily Fletcher within the Primary Care Research Group, in association with NHS England.

Workstream 3: Qualitative interviews

Qualitative interviews with GPs and other members of the general practice community in South West England, to identify the content of potential policies and strategies that might support the retention of GPs in direct patient care, will be led by Dr Sarah Dean (Psychology Applied to Health – PAtH – group), Professor Chris Salisbury (University of Bristol) and Dr Anna Sansom within the Primary Care Research Group.

Workstream 4: Expert panel assessment

An expert panel assessment of the likely feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed policies and strategies will be undertaken by our partner, Dr Rupa Chilvers (Tangerine Bee), and Dr Suzanne Richards within the Primary Care Research Group, using our expertise in the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) (publication taken from Professor Campbell’s profile page: Wright C, Moseley A, Chilvers R, Stabb L, Campbell JL, Richards SH (2009). Development of an early intervention to prevent long-term incapacity for work: using an online RAND/UCLA appropriateness method to obtain the views of general practitioners. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 10, 65-78). This method involves the development of statements around potential policies and strategies from the components identified through the systematic review and qualitative interview workstreams. The statements are presented online to an expert panel, comprised of members of key stakeholder groups with expertise and involvement in GP workforce planning, who review and rate/prioritise the statements in two rounds.

Workstream 5: Supply-demand modelling techniques

Building on the census survey’s assessment of current and projected GP capacity, we are using supply-demand modelling techniques, with input from our colleagues at the Department of Health to identify supply-demand imbalances at practice level that are likely within the next five years. This will demonstrate a way to strategically target any relevant policies and strategies produced at the end of the project.

Workstream 6: National stakeholder consultation meetings

Five national stakeholder consultation meetings will be led by the Primary Care team with members of key stakeholder groups who have expertise and involvement in GP workforce planning in order to ‘reality-test’ the proposed policies and strategies delivered by the RAM panel assessment in workstream 4. These consultations will determine the acceptability of the proposed policies and strategies, along with their likelihood of immediate uptake in light of any identified barriers and facilitators.

 

University of Exeter
Medical School team
Position 

Professor John Campbell

Chief Investigator

Mrs Emily Fletcher Project Manager
Associate Professor Rob Anderson Systematic Review Lead
Associate Professor Sarah Dean Qualitative Workstream Lead
Associate Professor Gary Abel Modelling Workstream Lead
Dr Anna Sansom Qualitative Researcher
Dr Suzanne Richards RAM workstream lead
Dr Rupa Chilvers Tangerine Bee – RAM specialist
Dr Jo Welsman Patient & Public Involvement Lead
Centre for Biomedical Modelling and Analysis
Dr Fiona Warren Statistician
Sophie Robinson Information Specialist
Sarah Dawkins Research Administrator
Dr Linda Long Systematic Reviewer

 

University of
Bristol team
Position  
Professor Chris Salisbury

Professor in Primary Health Care

Dr Rohini Terry

Qualitative Researcher

 

NHS ImprovementPosition  

Grant Fitzner

Economics Director                      

 

University of Exeter
Business School team
Position  

Professor Andi Smart                        

Professor of Operations & Process Management, Director - Centre for Innovation and Service Research (ISR)            

Dr Nav Mustafee

Senior Lecturer in Operations and Supply Chain Management, Program Director of BA Business and Management

Publications

December 2016

Following our last update in September, we have been very busy over the last few months, and we’d like to share with you an update of what’s been happening within the ReGROUP project.

The systematic review is now complete. It focuses on the factors that influence GPs’ quitting and career break decisions. Our final report that goes along with it is also on the way to completion.

Our survey generated a great response rate of 67% of all GPs (nearly 3,500) in the South West. The results have now been written up and we are anticipating that they will be published imminently!

Recruitment for people to take part in our qualitative interviews is now finished and analysis of these interviews is well underway.

We have now recruited the RAM expert panel. They will begin rating our draft policy statements in January, looking at the feasibility of each statement and how likely it is that they could be implemented into practice. The information that has been used to generate the policies and strategies has been obtained from input gained through the qualitative work and the systematic review.

Our modelling work, centered around supply and demand on GPs over the coming years (based on information from the survey and qualitative work), is nearly complete and will be written up in the New Year.

We are currently planning the national stakeholder consultation meetings. The aim of these meetings will be to present the drafted policies and strategies rated most highly by the RAM expert panel. We are looking for key stakeholders to take part in the meetings and will be sending out invitations soon – so keep an eye on your inboxes!

We look forward to updating you again soon but in the meantime we wish you all a very merry Christmas.

The ReGROUP research team

September 2016

Our research is progressing well. We have nearly completed a systematic review of the literature around factors influencing GPs’ quitting and career break decisions and also administering a large-scale survey of all GPs in South West England. An impressive 67% of GPs responded to the survey, which will help us establish an estimate of the proportion of GPs who intend to permanently quit direct patient care and/or take a career break within the next 5 years. We are enormously grateful to all who gave their time to respond!

We are currently in the process of conducting interviews with a number of GPs who returned the survey and also with others involved in general practice workforce planning here in the South West. The aim of the interviews is to identify potential content that can be used to structure policies and strategies that could support experienced GPs to remain in direct patient care.

In addition, our Patient Public Involvement group have supported the systematic review work, by feeding in their views on the literature and providing comment on the content of the emerging report.
Our next stage will involve recruiting an expert panel comprised of members of key stakeholder groups with expertise in workforce planning to give their views on the proposed policies and strategies that we will shortly draft following the completion of our first three workstreams.

Programme of work
We are committed to completing this research in less than two years as follows:

Workstream

Timeframe

Research team

Systematic Review

Jan – Aug 2016

Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement team (ESMI)

Workforce Survey

Jan –Jul 2016

Primary Care Research Group

Predictive Risk Modelling

Jan – Dec 2016

Centre for Workforce Intelligence

Qualitative Research

Jan 16 – Mar 2017

Primary Care Research Group/University of Bristol

Expert Panel

Sep 16 – Jul 2017

Tangerine Bee

Stakeholder Consultations

May – Sep 2017

Primary Care Research Group

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We look forward to updating you again soon!

The ReGROUP research team

Please click the link to complete our GP Workforce Questionnaire.

Qualified GPs registered on the NHS England Performer’s List in South West England have been invited to complete a brief online survey to indicate the likelihood of leaving or taking a break from direct patient care within the next 5 years.

All replies will be confidential, published survey data will be anonymised and we will not report or publish any individual-level or practice-level identifiable data, or release such data to anyone outside of the research teams at the Universities or Exeter or Bristol. To encourage participation, we are offering all participants entry into a prize draw: five winners will each receive a Kindle.

A sub-sample of those considering taking a break or leaving direct patient care, and those who have already left or are on a career break, will be invited to be interviewed (you can complete the questionnaire without consenting to interview). Interviews will take place face-to-face or by telephone on a mutually agreed day and time. Interviews will last no more than 30-60 minutes and will be completely confidential. You would be financially reimbursed for your time.

Why do GPs leave the workforce?

The University of Exeter Medical School has been commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research to investigate the factors contributing to GPs’ decisions to leave direct patient care (leading to career breaks or early retirement/retirement before the age of 60).

It is widely recognised that England faces a significant and imminent problem in respect of GP workforce capacity. Some GPs are considering leaving the clinical workforce, and in some places, fewer newly qualified doctors are choosing a career in general practice. There is potential for an important imbalance in the demand for primary care and the capacity to deliver it.

The ReGROUP study aims to explore GPs’ decision-making about taking a break from or leaving direct patient care, and possible ways to facilitate GP retention.

Contact us

If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the researchers directly:

Project Manager, Emily Fletchere.fletcher@exeter.ac.uk, 01392 722 826

Researcher, Dr Anna Sansom: a.sansom@exeter.ac.uk, 01392 726 189

The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) Panel is being formed as part of the ReGROUP study to assess the appropriateness and feasibility of policies and strategies for retaining GPs in direct patient care. This part of the research uses a well-established and internationally recognised technique to rate statements or criteria for appropriateness in clinical practice and health policy settings. The level of agreement is used to inform the next stages of development and the stakeholder consultation taking place later in 2017.

Our panellists have been invited from a wide range of GP practices and stakeholder organisations. We have selected the panellists based on their role in managing GP practices and/or their expertise in GP workforce development and retention. The RAM Panel members will receive a summary of the evidence and will be asked to participate in two rounds of online rating exercises. In the second round, they will be shown the group level responses for the first round and asked to review their first response. The median and level of agreement is used for reporting the results from the RAM process.

Why do GPs leave the workforce?

The University of Exeter Medical School has been commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) to investigate the factors contributing to GPs’ decisions to leave direct patient care (leading to career breaks or early retirement/retirement before the age of 60).

It is widely recognised that England faces a significant and imminent problem in respect of GP workforce capacity. Some GPs are considering leaving the clinical workforce, and in some places, fewer newly qualified doctors are choosing a career in general practice. There is potential for an important imbalance in the demand for primary care and the capacity to deliver it.

The ReGROUP study aims to explore GPs’ decision-making about taking a break from or leaving direct patient care, and possible ways to facilitate GP retention.

Contact Us

If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the researcher directly:
Researcher: Rupa Chilvers 
Project Manager: Emily Fletcher